Blog Layout

Professionalize Your Use of Force Review Process

Jason Louis • Apr 14, 2024
Professionalize Your Use of Force Review Process

Professionalize Your Use of Force Review Process


Internal procedural justice among officers is just as important as external procedural justice with the community. If  Police officers don't know what's expected of them or discipline is administered unfairly, it can cause hesitancy, resentment and poor morale; all of which is a disservice to your community.


Professionalizing your use of force review process so that officer's understand exactly what's expected of them and so they believe their actions will be evaluated fairly goes a long way toward avoiding negativity within an agency. 


To begin with, an agency should be clear about what the reporting requirements are for each type of force used.

California Department of Justice recommends dividing use of force into three levels to provide peace officers with a clear understanding of what to expect in the review process when that level of force occurs. These levels are for reporting and review only and not intended as a force continuum for the application of force. An example of this can be found on pages 36-44 of California DOJ's Review of the Sacramento Police Department, which you can find in the additional resources of this video.


Second, a methodical approach to reviews that always asks the same questions should be adopted for the review process. Whether its digital or on paper, specific questions based on law, policy and agency training should be applied to the review process to ensure all use of force incidents are reviewed as similarly as possible every day and officer to officer. An example form we created can be found in the additional resources section for this video.


And third, a clear process for the flow of paperwork and disposition of the investigation should be implemented. Officers should be clear about what's going to happen after they write their report. 


Implementing these three recommendations will go a long way to providing more consistent internal procedural justice and is consistent with modern police use of force oversight.

The Briefing Room has a short training video available on this exact scenario so agency supervisors can easily train every officer in your agency on this essential topic.

www.TheBriefingRoom.com 
90-Second Training Videos Your Supervisors Use During Briefing or Roll Call To Develop High-Performing Teams of Officers.
✅ Lower Liability
✅ Retain Officers
✅ Build Community Support


🌟 Produced Exclusively by Active-Duty Law Enforcement Instructors 🌟


By Jason Louis 27 Apr, 2024
While working at a DUI checkpoint, an officer is assigned to request a valid driver's license from drivers when they're stopped. However, one man in a vehicle tells the officer he won't provide his driver's license because there is no reasonable suspicion that he committed a crime, and the 4th Amendment protects his right to refuse. Can the Police Officer demand and ultimately arrest the man if he refuses to provide his driver's license?
By Jason Louis 24 Apr, 2024
Virtually every law enforcement association or oversight group recommends agencies adopt wellness programs to reduce use of force incidents. This is because wellness programs have been shown to help relieve PTSD, depression, obesity, divorce, diabetes, and many other life issues that lead to more significant stress among officers. Here are some recommendations from the experience of deputies setting up a wellness program within the agency I work for. First, start with modest goals with minimal to no cost. Find a motivated person in your agency who believes in the mission of a wellness program and work with them to develop these modest goals. These can include finding motivational posters you can hang in the station, cleaning up the station weight room, putting weight scales and blood pressure monitors in the locker rooms, and bringing in a volunteer from the community willing to speak during briefing about healthier eating. The initial goals should be clear benefits to the employees and easy to accompli
By Jason Louis 24 Apr, 2024
Consider this Scenario: Officers obtained a valid search warrant for a motel room. After the warrant was signed by the judge, they decided they wanted to search the suspect’s home. They called the judge, who verbally authorized a search of the second location. The officers didn’t physically amend the warrant. Question: Is the oral authorization from the judge, without physically amending the warrant, sufficient to allow the search of the second location? Here’s what the 9th Circuit said on August 30, 2022: "While a judge had orally approved the search of the home, the text of the Fourth Amendment still requires the warrant to specify the place to be searched." "...it was not clearly established at the time that the search would violate the Fourth Amendment. An officer could have believed- based on the lack of direct case law at the time- that he or she could search the home because the court had orally approved the search, even if the officer failed to make that change on the warrant." ............
More Posts
Share by: