Blog Layout

When The Passenger Is Detained, Is The Driver Automatically Detained?

Jason Louis • Mar 27, 2024
when the Passenger is Detained, is the driver automatically detained?

This post is only offered as a discussion topic only and does not represent legal advice. Officers must refer to the laws in their own State as well as their agency policy.


Scenario: While working patrol, a police officer sees a vehicle parked with two people inside and they want to do a consensual contact to see what they're up to. When the officer gets out of their car, the passenger suddenly gets out and tries to walk away, the officer recognizes him as a wanted person. The Police Officer detains him by telling him to stop.


Did that detention of the passenger automatically create a detention of the driver who's still seated in the car?



Answer: This was one of the questions in the California Supreme Court Case of People v. Tacardon from 2022. The Court said, "The critical factual question is whether (the driver) overheard or otherwise perceived the deputy's interaction with the passenger." "The question is not whether (the driver) was told he couldn't leave but whether the totality of the circumstances reasonably conveyed to (the driver) he was compelled to remain."


They said things that can affect that analysis include whether or not it was dark outside, whether the windows of the car were up or tinted, whether the engine was on or off and where the passenger was detained in relation to the driver.



So, in our initial scenario, if a police officer detains a passenger outside the vehicle, they can still contact the driver as though it was a consensual encounter as long as the totality of the circumstances don't lead him to believe he was compelled to remain.


The Briefing Room has a short training video available on this exact scenario so agency supervisors can easily train every officer in your agency on in this essential topic.


www.TheBriefingRoom.com 
90-Second Training Videos Your Supervisors Use During Briefing or Roll Call To Develop High-Performing Teams of Officers.
✅ Lower Liability
✅ Retain Officers
✅ Build Community Support


🌟 Produced Exclusively by Active-Duty Law Enforcement Instructors 🌟



By Jason Louis 27 Apr, 2024
While working at a DUI checkpoint, an officer is assigned to request a valid driver's license from drivers when they're stopped. However, one man in a vehicle tells the officer he won't provide his driver's license because there is no reasonable suspicion that he committed a crime, and the 4th Amendment protects his right to refuse. Can the Police Officer demand and ultimately arrest the man if he refuses to provide his driver's license?
By Jason Louis 24 Apr, 2024
Virtually every law enforcement association or oversight group recommends agencies adopt wellness programs to reduce use of force incidents. This is because wellness programs have been shown to help relieve PTSD, depression, obesity, divorce, diabetes, and many other life issues that lead to more significant stress among officers. Here are some recommendations from the experience of deputies setting up a wellness program within the agency I work for. First, start with modest goals with minimal to no cost. Find a motivated person in your agency who believes in the mission of a wellness program and work with them to develop these modest goals. These can include finding motivational posters you can hang in the station, cleaning up the station weight room, putting weight scales and blood pressure monitors in the locker rooms, and bringing in a volunteer from the community willing to speak during briefing about healthier eating. The initial goals should be clear benefits to the employees and easy to accompli
By Jason Louis 24 Apr, 2024
Consider this Scenario: Officers obtained a valid search warrant for a motel room. After the warrant was signed by the judge, they decided they wanted to search the suspect’s home. They called the judge, who verbally authorized a search of the second location. The officers didn’t physically amend the warrant. Question: Is the oral authorization from the judge, without physically amending the warrant, sufficient to allow the search of the second location? Here’s what the 9th Circuit said on August 30, 2022: "While a judge had orally approved the search of the home, the text of the Fourth Amendment still requires the warrant to specify the place to be searched." "...it was not clearly established at the time that the search would violate the Fourth Amendment. An officer could have believed- based on the lack of direct case law at the time- that he or she could search the home because the court had orally approved the search, even if the officer failed to make that change on the warrant." ............
More Posts
Share by: